Mirena Pregnancy Birth Injury Lawsuit | Mirena lawsuit
Mirena lawsuit | Mirena lawsuits | Mirena lawsuit due to pregnancy, Mirena lawsuit due to birth injury | Mirena Pregnancy Lawsuit, Mirena Birth Injury Lawsuit, Mirena Ectopic Pregnancy Lawsuit, Mirena IUD Pregnancy | Mirena IUD Birth Injury | Mirena Ectopic Pregnancy | Mirena IUD Pregnancy Birth Injury
Mirena Lawsuit Info: While the Mirena IUD is an extremely effective method of birth control, women sometimes do become pregnant while using the device – especially if the implant migrates from its proper position in the uterus. This may pose a serious danger to the developing fetus resulting in Mirena IUD pregnancies birth injuries, especially if the IUD is not located and removed early in the pregnancy. Becoming pregnant while using the Mirena IUD implant may lead to ectopic pregnancy, infection resulting in loss of the baby, premature birth, and even death of the child after he/she is born.
Southern Med Law is now offering free, no-obligation Mirena lawsuit case reviews for Mirena pregnancy lawsuit | Mirena birth injury lawsuit | Mirena Ectopic Pregancy Lawsuits to alleged victims of Mirena pregnancy birth injuries. If you became pregnant while using the Mirena IUD, and your baby was harmed in any way due to a Mirena pregnancy, or you suffered a Mirena ectopic pregnancy you may be entitled to compensation from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. As both an attorney and practicing obstetrician / gynecologist, Dr. François Blaudeau’s understanding of pregnancy and female reproductive issues, together with his knowledge of the law, allows Southern Med Law to approach these types of cases with a unique perspective. To learn how Southern Med Law can use their in-depth knowledge and experience to help you and your family, please contact Southern Med Law today for a free Mirena lawsuit: Mirena pregnancy lawsuit | Mirena birth injury lawsuit | Mirena Ectopic Pregancy Lawsuit review by calling or visit www.southernmedlaw.com for more information on this and other legal topics.
Mirena and Pregnancy
The Mirena IUD label states that fewer than 8 in 1,000 women will become pregnant while using the device. However, a growing number of Mirena IUD lawsuits allege that the device is prone to spontaneous migration, which occurs when the implant moves from its proper position in the uterus. This can cause a host of complications, including uterine perforations, organ damage, infertility and scarring. A migrating Mirena IUD will also fail to prevent pregnancy.
About half of all Mirena pregnancies that occur with the Mirena IUD will be ectopic pregnancies. This is a pregnancy that occurs outside of the uterus, usually within a fallopian tube. An ectopic pregnancy cannot survive, and allowing it to progress puts a woman’s fertility and her life at risk. For this reason, ectopic pregnancies must be terminated.
Mirena Ectopic Pregnancy With the Mirena IUD present
A pregnancy that occurs in the uterus is also risky if the Mirena IUD is present, and may result in Mirena birth injuries that include infection, miscarriage, premature delivery and even death. For this reason, the IUD must be removed if the woman plans to continue the pregnancy, even though the procedure may induce a miscarriage. However, if the Mirena IUD has migrated, locating the device and removing it might not be possible.
Mirena pregnancy lawsuit due to Mirena present putting fetus at risk for serious birth defects
According to Mirena lawsuit claims, if the device is not removed, the IUD or its fragments may perforate the uterine wall or even become lodged in the fetus. The unborn baby will continue to be exposed to the powerful hormone, levonorgesterel, which is continuously emitted by the IUD. This allegedly puts the fetus at risk for serious birth defects, including anencephaly and other neural tube defects.
Mirena Lawsuits Consolidated Into Federal Multidistrict Litigation And State Litigation
Federally filed Mirena lawsuits were consolidated in April 2013 in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. There were 40 Mirena lawsuits filed when the complaints were consolidated. Now, federal court documents show that there are over 1,170 Mirena lawsuits pending in the multidistrict litigation as of February 2015. (Mirena lawsuits New York; In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434.) According to Mirena IUD lawsuits court records, Mirena lawsuits were also consolidated in New Jersey’s Bergen County Superior Court. (Mirena lawsuits New Jersey; In Re: Mirena Litigation; Case No. 297) The state and federal Mirena lawsuits allege that the Mirena IUD has a design defect due to the spontaneous migration of the device. The Mirena lawsuit complaints accuse the company that inadequate warnings by Bayer hid the risks of spontaneous migration.
FDA And Mirena: FDA Sent Warning Letter To Bayer Due To Advertising “Unsubstantiated Claims,” And Minimizing Risks Of Mirena IUD
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000 approved Mirena as an intrauterine contraceptive. Mirena (levonorgestrel intrauterine system) is a progestin-only IUD that releases low doses directly in the uterus to provide stable serum concentrations after the first few weeks. The contraceptive is recommended for females who have already had a child and want to prevent another pregnancy. In 2009, the FDA also approved the intrauterine device to treat heavy menstrual bleeding in women who use IUDs as their method of pregnancy prevention. Also in 2009, the FDA sent a warning letter to Bayer accusing the company’s advertisements of overstating the device’s effectiveness, presenting “unsubstantiated claims,” and minimizing the risks of using Mirena.
[fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm184747.htm, April 17, 2013]
[fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/WarningLettersandNoticeofViolationLetterstoPharmaceuticalCompanies/UCM197229.pdf, December 30, 2009]
Mirena IUD studies regarding Levonorgestrel
In August 2014, a Finnish study published in the Obstetrics & Gynecology in August 2014 found a “higher than expected” risk of breast cancer associated with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. This study used data from Finnish women, ages 30 to 49, who used a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, like Mirena, for treatment of menorrhagia in 1994-2007. Breast cancer among women who used an intrauterine device was 19 percent higher than females in the general population who did not use a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system according to the study. Another intrauterine device using levonorgestrel study published by the American College of Obstetrics & Gynecology in October 2014 found women between the ages of 14-19 were more likely to experience the expulsion of the IUD than women you are older.
[ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25004338, August 2014]
[ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198262, October 2014]
Legal Help for Victims and Filing A Mirena lawsuit: Mirena pregnancy lawsuit | Mirena birth injury lawsuit | Mirena Ectopic Pregancy Lawsuit
Throughout his career, Dr. Blaudeau has worked hard to develop a strong reputation in healthcare litigation. His first-hand knowledge of medicine has made Southern Med Law an aggressive and effective advocate for those who were injured due to negligent medical device manufacturers. If your baby was harmed by the Mirena IUD, please contact Southern Med Law today to learn more about your legal rights. You can arrange for a free, no obligation Mirena IUD Pregnancy Birth Injury Lawsuit review by filling out our online form, or by calling the office directly at 205-547-5525.
To learn how Southern Med Law can use their in-depth knowledge and experience to help you and your family, please contact Southern Med Law today for a free Mirena lawsuit: Mirena pregnancy lawsuit | Mirena birth injury lawsuit | Mirena Ectopic Pregancy Lawsuit review by calling or visit www.southernmedlaw.com for more information on this and other legal topics.